internal-noteUpdated 2026-04-11
Google Things to Do and Discoverability
A source note on why structured experience data and discoverability surfaces matter as search and planning interfaces evolve.
Source
Internal synthesis on Google Things to Do
Tags
google things to dodiscoverabilitystructured dataattractions
Core takeaway
Search visibility for experiences increasingly depends on structured, machine-readable content rather than only classic SEO patterns. Google Things to Do is one of the clearest examples of this shift.
Why it matters for this repo
This topic sits at the intersection of editorial authority and operator relevance. It is strong material for explainers, course modules, keynote framing, and practical audits.
Practical implications
- Structured product data becomes strategic, not just technical.
- Distribution teams need to think about discoverability across both search interfaces and AI surfaces.
- Content systems that keep product information consistent gain long-term leverage.
Follow-up questions
- Which parts of experience metadata matter most for discoverability?
- How should operators prioritize structured content fixes?
- What should the public library teach versus what should stay inside training resources?